Platform
AI feedback with human oversight and responsible voice data
Teachrity treats AI scoring as provisional, formative evidence. Faculty, academic boards and managers decide grades, progression, hiring and discipline. Learners can see criteria in advance and request review. Voice audio and transcripts are handled as personal data with agreed consent, retention and access.
Human authority over outcomes
The AI assembles rubric-mapped evidence from an attempt. A named human decides what it means. Summative grades, progression, licensing, hiring and disciplinary results never rest on an AI score alone.
Moderation and consistency
Faculty can override scores, compare marks across sections and adjuncts, and apply one rubric to every cohort, which reduces drift between assessors. Disputed scores follow a documented review and appeal route.
Authentic practice, not surveillance
Spoken, scenario-based tasks are hard to outsource to a text generator. Teachrity is used for rehearsal and oral assessment design, not for proctoring or biometric identification.
Consent and voice data
Learners are told what is recorded and why. Institutions act as data fiduciaries and Teachrity as processor under their agreement, with retention, deletion and access set up front.
Responsible AI use
Learners see how the AI counterpart behaves, where it can be wrong, and how to challenge feedback. Where audio or context is unclear, the evidence is marked for review instead of being assumed a failure.
Scenarios in this track
6 practice scenarios sit under this topic. Open any to see the situation a learner rehearses.
AI Grading With Human Oversight In Education
A faculty member sees a suggested score that conflicts with the learner's response and must decide how to resolve it.
Assessment Moderation And Rubric Calibration Software
Two reviewers give different scores to the same response because they interpret a rubric differently.
AI Voice Assessment Data Privacy And Security
A university wants to use voice interactions and asks what is collected, retained, shared and deleted.
Responsible AI Use Training And Assessment
A learner uses an AI-generated response containing a plausible but unsupported claim in an assignment.
AI Assessment Appeal And Review Process
A student believes feedback misread an answer and asks to see the evidence behind the score.
Voice AI Training Consent Privacy Policy
A buyer wants to use voice practice with staff and asks how participants are informed and recordings managed.
Frequently asked questions
Can Teachrity grade a final exam?+
It can support oral assessment by producing provisional, rubric-mapped evidence. The institution decides how that evidence is used and keeps a human accountable for the final mark.
What happens if a student disputes a score?+
The attempt, transcript and rubric evidence are available to the reviewer. Unclear audio or context is marked for review instead of assumed to be a failure.
Does Teachrity comply with the DPDP Act?+
Teachrity is designed to support an institution's compliance duties by separating fiduciary and processor roles and agreeing consent, retention and security terms. Compliance itself rests on your policies and legal advice.
Related on Teachrity
Teachrity supports practice and evidence. Consequential decisions, such as grades, certification or hiring, stay with accountable people at the institution or employer.
Talk to Teachrity